In addition to that, he will pay a severe penalty for the detriment he caused. The fact is that we must learn the simple truth that by applying the actions of revenge towards the offender can only make the person who hit at the others’ eye turned from a victim to culprit. However, if we, the bystanders, put some effort into contemplation of this melancholy tragedy as well as the consequences it brings with it, we may reach an utterly contrasting consensus or conclusion. People in favor of the statement would immediately say that the person who fought back was right in his actions, as he defeated his “enemy” and did not display his weakness as a human being. I didn’t feel the necessity of thinking about the consequences”, while the other one’s eye is bleeding. More frequently, you would hear people saying things like” Oh, I just wanted to revenge and show him my power.
I believe that almost every single one of you have seen the scene of two students standing in the school principle’s office, and one of them saying that he or she just hit the other person in return with no purpose of actually harming them. It has been discovered that 10% of the crimes were committed following the principle of “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” This astonishing statistic aroused a controversy of whether or not “An eye for an eye” is the correct basis of determining an appropriate punishment, as it not only touches upon political, but also cultural, ethical, or even religious issues.It would be easier to analyze the notion mentioned above on a relatively smaller scale. It is a rare occasion to go throughout a day in this barbaric world and not hear any of these things.
When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, we are bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, serial killers, and other such tragedies.